Dyadic Synchrony: Does Cialis Affect Cardiorespiratory and Motor Synchrony of Partners?

Introduction

Interpersonal Synchrony, the subtle alignment of physiological and behavioral signals between individuals, is increasingly recognized as a powerful marker of emotional connectedness, psychological attunement, and relational health. In romantic partners, this synchrony often manifests through coordinated heart rate variability, breathing cycles, and micro-movements during conversation or shared tasks. Extensive research demonstrates that greater synchrony correlates with higher empathy, trust, and relationship satisfaction (Palumbo et al., 2017; Feldman, 2012).

This article explores a novel hypothesis: that tadalafil (Cialis), a well-established PDE5 inhibitor known to enhance vascular and autonomic regulation through NO–cGMP–mediated vasodilation, may promote improved dyadic synchrony. By augmenting vascular tone and enabling more flexible autonomic responses indexed by heart rate variability (HRV), tadalafil might enhance physiological alignment between partners during shared tasks, thereby supporting emotional attunement and well-being.

While tadalafil’s primary indication remains erectile dysfunction, emerging studies show it can modestly improve endothelial function and reduce vascular stiffness even in low-risk populations (Wallis et al., 2021). If these improvements extend to autonomic regulation, they may facilitate greater physiological resonance in close interpersonal contexts.

The following sections outline the concept of dyadic synchrony and its relevance to mental well-being; describe the autonomic mechanisms underpinning HRV and social coordination; propose a pilot study employing wearable sensors and structured couple tasks; explore self-report outcomes; address potential confounders and analytic methods; and finally, consider how insights from this work can inform couple therapy interventions grounded in physiological co-regulation.

What Is Dyadic Synchrony and Why It Matters for Mental Well-Being

Dyadic synchrony refers to the temporal alignment of physiological, motoric, and affective states between individuals engaged in a shared interaction. This phenomenon is not confined to conscious mimicry or social conformity. It emerges spontaneously through co-regulation of autonomic responses (e.g., heart rate and respiration), facial expressions, gaze, gesture, and vocal rhythms during emotionally meaningful engagements. While observable in many social contexts, dyadic synchrony is particularly salient in close relationships, including parent–infant bonding, romantic partnerships, and therapeutic alliances (Feldman, 2012; Tschacher et al., 2014).

Research shows that couples with higher degrees of moment-to-moment synchrony report greater relationship satisfaction, emotional intimacy, and stress-buffering capacity. At the neurobiological level, synchrony is thought to be supported by networks involved in interoception, mentalization, and autonomic regulation, including the insula, anterior cingulate cortex, and vagus nerve pathways. These systems collectively allow individuals to both perceive their internal state and attune to the bodily cues of others. Synchrony also plays a protective role in mental health. For example, coordinated heart rate and breathing during conflict discussions have been linked to better affect regulation and lower reactivity, while mismatches in physiological arousal may exacerbate stress and miscommunication (Palumbo et al., 2017). Similarly, nonverbal synchrony in psychotherapy predicts stronger alliance and more favorable clinical outcomes (Ramseyer & Tschacher, 2011).

Despite its relevance, synchrony is rarely considered in pharmacological studies. Most psychotropic agents target individual symptoms or cognitive traits, not interpersonal dynamics. This raises the question: could drugs that enhance autonomic flexibility or vascular health, such as tadalafil, indirectly support the biological substrate of interpersonal synchrony? If so, pharmacologically facilitated synchrony might open new doors in relational interventions, providing physiological scaffolding for deeper interpersonal connection.

Vegetative Regulation, NO-Dependent Vasodilation, and Heart Rate Variability

At the core of interpersonal synchrony lies the autonomic nervous system (ANS), which governs involuntary physiological processes such as heart rate, respiration, vascular tone, and pupil dilation. The capacity of the ANS, particularly the parasympathetic branch, to rapidly adapt to social and emotional demands is a key determinant of relational health. This adaptive flexibility is often indexed through heart rate variability (HRV), a widely validated marker of vagal tone and resilience under psychological and physiological stress (Thayer et al., 2012).

HRV is not only a biomarker of individual well-being but also a relational signal. Studies show that romantic partners with higher resting HRV exhibit more effective emotional co-regulation, higher empathic accuracy, and increased behavioral synchrony during shared tasks (Kogan et al., 2014). These effects are thought to be mediated through neurovisceral integration, a model that links autonomic flexibility with prefrontal modulation of affect and social cognition.

Enter tadalafil, a PDE5 inhibitor that enhances nitric oxide (NO)-mediated cGMP signaling, resulting in vascular smooth muscle relaxation and improved endothelial function. While best known for increasing penile blood flow, tadalafil also improves systemic vascular compliance and reduces arterial stiffness, even at low daily doses (Wallis et al., 2021). Emerging evidence suggests these vascular improvements can translate into measurable changes in HRV, particularly in populations with subclinical endothelial dysfunction or autonomic rigidity. By improving vegetative regulation, tadalafil may indirectly enhance the body’s capacity to enter and sustain coordinated physiological states with others. In this context, HRV becomes not just a cardiovascular health metric, but a gateway to social synchrony – a substrate for emotional attunement, trust, and dyadic flow. If tadalafil subtly shifts this baseline, it may amplify the spontaneous coupling of rhythms that underlie emotionally connected interaction.

Pilot Protocol: Couples, Wearable Sensors, Laboratory Coordination Tasks

To empirically test the hypothesis that low-dose tadalafil enhances dyadic synchrony, a pilot study could be conducted using daily 5 mg tadalafil over a 4-week period in romantic couples, with pre- and post-intervention assessments of physiological and motoric synchrony. The goal would be to detect whether improvements in vascular and autonomic flexibility translate into more precise or sustained interpersonal alignment during coordinated tasks.

Participants

The study would recruit 20–30 heterosexual or same-sex couples in stable relationships for at least 6 months, aged 25–55, with no major medical conditions (e.g., cardiovascular disease or erectile dysfunction) that could confound results. Couples would be screened for baseline relationship quality using the Couples Satisfaction Index (CSI) to ensure moderate to high satisfaction levels (Funk & Rogge, 2007).

Intervention

One partner in each couple would be randomly assigned to take tadalafil 5 mg daily for 4 weeks, while the other takes placebo. This active-placebo design allows for both within-couple comparison (active vs. placebo) and between-couple variability. The 5 mg dose is chosen for its low side-effect profile and demonstrated effects on endothelial function without pronounced sexual enhancement (Wallis et al., 2021).

Assessments

Pre- and post-intervention lab sessions would involve synchronized biometric recording using wearable sensors (e.g., Empatica E4 or Biopac systems) to capture HRV, respiration rate, electrodermal activity, and motion data. Couples would engage in a series of structured tasks designed to elicit varying degrees of synchrony:

• Neutral conversation (5 min): Discussing a non-emotional topic (e.g., daily routines).
• Affective sharing (5 min): Taking turns sharing a positive memory while maintaining eye contact.
• Conflict simulation (5 min): Discussing a minor disagreement with instructions to resolve it collaboratively.
• Mirror task (3 min): One partner leads slow movements (e.g., arm raises), while the other mirrors in real time.

These tasks allow for comparison across emotional valences and provide multimodal data for cross-correlation analysis (Helm et al., 2012).

Ethics and Feasibility

The protocol would require IRB approval, informed consent for off-label use, and medical screening for contraindications (e.g., nitrate use). Feasibility is high given the non-invasive nature of assessments and the drug’s established safety profile.

This design sets the stage for exploring whether tadalafil can subtly shift the physiological landscape of close relationships, paving the way for more targeted relational interventions.

Self-Report Outcomes: Relationship Satisfaction, Empathy, Perceived Synchrony

In addition to physiological markers, self-report outcomes provide a critical window into the subjective experience of synchrony and its relational impact.

Participants would complete validated questionnaires pre- and post-intervention to capture changes in perceived interpersonal connection and emotional attunement. Key measures include:

• The Couples Satisfaction Index (CSI): A 16-item scale assessing overall relationship quality and satisfaction (Funk & Rogge, 2007).
• The Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI): A 28-item tool measuring empathy, with subscales for perspective-taking and empathic concern (Davis, 1983).
• A custom Perceived Synchrony Scale: Adapted from prior studies, this would ask partners to rate how “in sync” they felt during tasks on dimensions such as emotional resonance, bodily attunement, and conversational flow (e.g., “We seemed to breathe or move at the same rhythm”; rated 1–7).

These instruments allow for correlation between objective synchrony metrics (e.g., HRV coupling) and subjective experience, addressing whether physiological changes are consciously registered and valued by participants. For instance, increased HRV alignment may correspond to higher empathy scores or greater perceived “flow” during interactions.

Self-reports also serve as a safeguard against over-reliance on biometrics, capturing nuances like cultural differences in expressing connection or individual variability in interoceptive awareness. If tadalafil enhances synchrony, these outcomes could reveal downstream benefits for relational well-being, such as reduced conflict or improved intimacy.

Confounders, Analysis, and Statistics

Assessing dyadic synchrony in a pharmacological context demands not only precise biometric recording but also vigilant control of confounding influences that may obscure or inflate the interpretation of effects.

Numerous factors beyond the intervention, ranging from lifestyle behaviors to biological rhythms, can modulate autonomic regulation and contribute to apparent synchrony.

To ensure data integrity, the study should track medication adherence through daily logging or electronic monitoring. Simultaneously, variables such as caffeine intake, alcohol consumption, nicotine use, and sleep quality must be monitored consistently, as they each independently affect heart rate variability and vascular tone. In female participants, menstrual cycle phase should be recorded due to its known influence on autonomic reactivity. Additionally, physical activity levels should be assessed, given their capacity to alter baseline vagal tone and recovery profiles.

The analysis of synchrony will rely on time-series methods capable of capturing dynamic, non-linear alignment between partners’ physiological signals. Windowed cross-correlation can detect time-lagged synchrony across short epochs, while phase-locking value offers a measure of the temporal stability in oscillatory relationships, such as synchronized respiration or heart rate fluctuations. Granger causality testing may reveal whether one partner’s physiological shifts predict those of the other, highlighting the directional influence of coupling. For more complex behavioral signals, such as motor patterns or speech pacing, dynamic time warping provides a means to compare trajectories even when timing differs slightly between individuals.

To distinguish genuine co-regulation from random co-occurrence, signal permutations across dyads, creating synthetic null pairs, can establish baseline thresholds. Statistical models will compare within-dyad changes pre- and post-intervention, as well as between active-active and active-placebo groups.

These approaches, combined with strict control of contextual variables, are essential for determining whether tadalafil meaningfully enhances biophysiological coupling between romantic partners in a way that is both replicable and relationally significant.

Clinical Perspective for Couple Therapy

The potential to pharmacologically enhance dyadic synchrony invites a new layer of consideration for couple-based interventions. While traditional couples therapy focuses on verbal communication, emotional expression, and conflict resolution, an emerging body of work suggests that nonverbal physiological coordination, such as shared heart rhythms, matched breathing, and synchronized gestures, plays a foundational role in relationship health. These implicit processes may serve as precursors or amplifiers of relational trust, safety, and co-regulation. If low-dose tadalafil improves autonomic flexibility and vascular responsiveness, it may act as a physiological primer, lowering the barrier to embodied interpersonal resonance. In therapeutic settings, this could enhance the efficacy of interventions that rely on presence, mirroring, or affective attunement, particularly for couples who struggle with tension, avoidance, or dysregulated arousal. While not a substitute for relational work, the medication could be positioned as a biological scaffold that facilitates conditions for synchrony—complementing behavioral or emotionally focused therapy.

That said, clinical integration must be approached with care. Tadalafil is not currently indicated for use outside sexual dysfunction, and any off-label application would require thorough screening, informed consent, and medical oversight. Moreover, the effect, if real, is likely subtle and contingent upon pre-existing relational dynamics. It should never be framed as a standalone solution, but rather as a potential enhancer of safety and responsiveness during shared therapeutic activities.

This framework also opens doors to integrative protocols in future studies, pairing pharmacological priming with structured dyadic tasks, breathing synchrony exercises, or mindfulness-based partner work. Ultimately, such an approach could support couples not only in talking through their issues, but in physiologically experiencing each other in more regulated and receptive states.

References

1. Coan, J. A., Schaefer, H. S., & Davidson, R. J. (2006). Lending a hand: Social regulation of the neural response to threat. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1032–1039. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17201784/
2. Feldman, R. (2012). Parent–infant synchrony: A biobehavioral model of mutual influences in the formation of affiliative bonds. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 77(2), 42–51. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23076365/
3. Funk, J. L., & Rogge, R. D. (2007). Testing the ruler with item response theory: Increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(4), 572–583. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18179329/
4. Helm, J. L., Sbarra, D. A., & Ferrer, E. (2012). Assessing cross-partner associations in physiological responses via coupled oscillator models. Emotion, 12(4), 748–762. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22309724/
5. Kogan, A., Gruber, J., Shallcross, A. J., Ford, B. Q., & Mauss, I. B. (2014). Vagal activity is quadratically related to prosocial traits, prosocial emotions, and observer perceptions of prosociality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(6), 1051–1063. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25347169/
6. Palumbo, R. V., Marraccini, M. E., Weyandt, L. L., Wilder-Smith, O., McGee, H. A., Liu, S., & Goodwin, M. S. (2017). Interpersonal Autonomic Physiology: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21(2), 99–141. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27872338/
7. Ramseyer, F., & Tschacher, W. (2011). Nonverbal synchrony in psychotherapy: Coordinated body movement reflects relationship quality and outcome. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79(3), 284–295. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21534698/
8. Thayer, J. F., Åhs, F., Fredrikson, M., Sollers, J. J. III, & Wager, T. D. (2012). A meta-analysis of heart rate variability and neuroimaging studies: Implications for heart rate variability as a marker of stress and health. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(2), 747–756. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22178086/
9. Tschacher, W., Rees, G. M., & Ramseyer, F. (2014). Nonverbal synchrony and affect in dyadic interactions. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1323. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01323/full
10. Wallis, C. J. D., Lee, C., Cheng, L., Klaassen, Z., & Satkunasivam, R. (2021). Effect of daily tadalafil on endothelial function in men with increased cardiovascular risk. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 18(2), 293–300. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33321006/